首页 \ 问答 \ 在课堂上验证物品的良好做法。(Good practice for validating items in class.)

在课堂上验证物品的良好做法。(Good practice for validating items in class.)

我实际上发现给这个帖子一个很难的标题。 我目前正在C#中使用dot Net编程课程。 我们的任务是使用Windows窗体和实体框架使用存储库服务模式构建一个简单的库。

我有一个表单,我正在向数据库中添加一个Book实体,即向库中添加一本新书。 我在这堂课中正在做的事情是检查字段以确保用户实际输入了一些文本,ISBN号是正确的格式,书籍还不存在....你明白了。 我一直在努力决定如何构建流程的执行方式。 当我点击提交新书时,我最初在on_click方法中有一堆if语句进行验证。

private void btn_bookSubmit_Click(object sender, EventArgs e)
    {
        string  newBookName    = this.tb_bookTitle.Text;
        string  newBookAuthor  = this.tb_bookAuthor.Text;
        string  newBookISBN    = this.tb_bookISBN.Text;
        string  description    = this.tb_bookDesc.Text;



        if (bookIsNotValid(newBookISBN, newBookName, newBookAuthor))
        {
            MessageBox.Show(this.validationError);
            return;
        }
        if (bookService.BookTitleExists(newBookName))
        {
            MessageBox.Show("A book by this title already exists in the library");
            return;
        }
        if (bookService.ISBNExists(newBookISBN))
        {
            MessageBox.Show("This ISBN belongs to another book in the library.  Please double check the ISBN number and try again");
            return;
        }
        if (this.authorService.doesAuthorExistByName(newBookAuthor))
        {
            DialogResult result = MessageBox.Show
                ("This author does not exist in the database.  Do you want to add this author?",
                "Author Does not Exist", MessageBoxButtons.YesNo);

            if (result == DialogResult.Yes) this.authorService.addAuthor(newBookAuthor);
            if (result == DialogResult.No)
            {
                MessageBox.Show("New book entry cancled.  In order to enter a new book into the system a valid Author must be specified");
                return ;
            }
        }


        bookService.addBook(newBookISBN, newBookName, newBookAuthor, description);


        MessageBox.Show(
            string.Format("{0} succesfully added to the library", newBookName), 
            string.Format("{0} added Successfully", newBookName), 
            MessageBoxButtons.OK);

        this.clearFields(); 
    }

我心想; 这是一个方法的相当多的代码。 所以我将它拆分为表单类中的更多私有函数,最后得到一个类似于此的方法:

private void btn_bookSubmit_Click(object sender, EventArgs e)
    {
        string  newBookName    = this.tb_bookTitle.Text;
        string  newBookAuthor  = this.tb_bookAuthor.Text;
        string  newBookISBN    = this.tb_bookISBN.Text;
        string  description    = this.tb_bookDesc.Text;

        if (!isBookValid(newBookISBN, newBookName, newBookAuthor))  return;
        if (!isTitleValid(newBookName))                             return;
        if (!isISBNvalid(newBookISBN))                              return;
        if (!isAuthorNew(newBookAuthor))                            return;

        bookService.addBook(newBookISBN, newBookName, newBookAuthor, description);


        MessageBox.Show(
            string.Format("{0} succesfully added to the library", newBookName), 
            string.Format("{0} added Successfully", newBookName), 
            MessageBoxButtons.OK);

        this.clearFields(); 
    }

现在我班上有很多方法。 那是好习惯吗? 它对我来说看起来更干净,但是在我上课时可能更难以筛选方法,而不是在一个函数中看到所有这些都发生。 我想到的另一件事是将我的所有验证都移到一个函数而不是很多,但是我必须处理布尔返回以及如何以不同方式停止我的函数。

我已经研究了我的程序2年了,已经尝试过,javascript,php,html5,c ++,C,现在c#试图找出我最喜欢的程序。 我从所有编程中获得的最多的是我喜欢美观而高效的代码。 我可能无法做到这一点,但我正在努力学习它。 所以你可能会注意到任何其他糟糕的做法,请告诉我。 到目前为止,在课堂上一切正常,我真正的问题是,我正在实施验证过程的方式好吗? 好? 低劣? 慢?


I actually found giving this thread a title quite hard. Im currently taking a dot Net programming course in C#. We've been given the task of building a simple library using windows forms and Entity Frameworks using a repository service pattern.

I have a form where I'm adding a Book entity to the database aka adding a new book to the library. Things I am doing in this class are checking the fields to make sure that the user actually entered some text, the ISBN number is the right format, the book doesn't already exist.... you get the point. What I've been trying to decide is how to structure the way the processes are carried out. When I click to submit the new book I originally had a bunch of if statements in the on_click method that do my validation.

private void btn_bookSubmit_Click(object sender, EventArgs e)
    {
        string  newBookName    = this.tb_bookTitle.Text;
        string  newBookAuthor  = this.tb_bookAuthor.Text;
        string  newBookISBN    = this.tb_bookISBN.Text;
        string  description    = this.tb_bookDesc.Text;



        if (bookIsNotValid(newBookISBN, newBookName, newBookAuthor))
        {
            MessageBox.Show(this.validationError);
            return;
        }
        if (bookService.BookTitleExists(newBookName))
        {
            MessageBox.Show("A book by this title already exists in the library");
            return;
        }
        if (bookService.ISBNExists(newBookISBN))
        {
            MessageBox.Show("This ISBN belongs to another book in the library.  Please double check the ISBN number and try again");
            return;
        }
        if (this.authorService.doesAuthorExistByName(newBookAuthor))
        {
            DialogResult result = MessageBox.Show
                ("This author does not exist in the database.  Do you want to add this author?",
                "Author Does not Exist", MessageBoxButtons.YesNo);

            if (result == DialogResult.Yes) this.authorService.addAuthor(newBookAuthor);
            if (result == DialogResult.No)
            {
                MessageBox.Show("New book entry cancled.  In order to enter a new book into the system a valid Author must be specified");
                return ;
            }
        }


        bookService.addBook(newBookISBN, newBookName, newBookAuthor, description);


        MessageBox.Show(
            string.Format("{0} succesfully added to the library", newBookName), 
            string.Format("{0} added Successfully", newBookName), 
            MessageBoxButtons.OK);

        this.clearFields(); 
    }

And I thought to myself; Thats quite a lot of code for one method. So I split it up into more private functions in the form class and ended up with a method that looked like this instead:

private void btn_bookSubmit_Click(object sender, EventArgs e)
    {
        string  newBookName    = this.tb_bookTitle.Text;
        string  newBookAuthor  = this.tb_bookAuthor.Text;
        string  newBookISBN    = this.tb_bookISBN.Text;
        string  description    = this.tb_bookDesc.Text;

        if (!isBookValid(newBookISBN, newBookName, newBookAuthor))  return;
        if (!isTitleValid(newBookName))                             return;
        if (!isISBNvalid(newBookISBN))                              return;
        if (!isAuthorNew(newBookAuthor))                            return;

        bookService.addBook(newBookISBN, newBookName, newBookAuthor, description);


        MessageBox.Show(
            string.Format("{0} succesfully added to the library", newBookName), 
            string.Format("{0} added Successfully", newBookName), 
            MessageBoxButtons.OK);

        this.clearFields(); 
    }

Now I have quite a few methods in my class. Is that good practice? It looks a lot cleaner to me, but maybe its harder to sift through methods when going over my class than it is to see all of it happening within the one function. The other thing I thought about was to move all of my validation into one function instead of many, but then I'd have to handle the boolean return and how to stop my function differently.

I've been studying my program for 2 years now, have tried out, javascript, php, html5, c++, C, now c# trying to figure out which I enjoy the most. What I've taken out the most from all the programming is that I love beautiful and efficient code. I may not be able to do that yet, but Im trying my damndest to learn it. So any other shitty practices you might notice please let me know. So far everything works fine in the class and my real question is, is the way I'm implementing my validation process ok? good? shitty? slow?


原文:https://stackoverflow.com/questions/19989326
更新时间:2023-04-05 12:04

最满意答案

如果要在SVG中实现此功能,则必须确保矩形宽度/高度始终为正并相应地计算x / y。


If you want to implement this in SVG you'll have to make sure the rectangles width/height are always positive and calculate the x/y accordingly.

相关问答

更多

相关文章

更多

最新问答

更多
  • 您如何使用git diff文件,并将其应用于同一存储库的副本的本地分支?(How do you take a git diff file, and apply it to a local branch that is a copy of the same repository?)
  • 将长浮点值剪切为2个小数点并复制到字符数组(Cut Long Float Value to 2 decimal points and copy to Character Array)
  • OctoberCMS侧边栏不呈现(OctoberCMS Sidebar not rendering)
  • 页面加载后对象是否有资格进行垃圾回收?(Are objects eligible for garbage collection after the page loads?)
  • codeigniter中的语言不能按预期工作(language in codeigniter doesn' t work as expected)
  • 在计算机拍照在哪里进入
  • 使用cin.get()从c ++中的输入流中丢弃不需要的字符(Using cin.get() to discard unwanted characters from the input stream in c++)
  • No for循环将在for循环中运行。(No for loop will run inside for loop. Testing for primes)
  • 单页应用程序:页面重新加载(Single Page Application: page reload)
  • 在循环中选择具有相似模式的列名称(Selecting Column Name With Similar Pattern in a Loop)
  • System.StackOverflow错误(System.StackOverflow error)
  • KnockoutJS未在嵌套模板上应用beforeRemove和afterAdd(KnockoutJS not applying beforeRemove and afterAdd on nested templates)
  • 散列包括方法和/或嵌套属性(Hash include methods and/or nested attributes)
  • android - 如何避免使用Samsung RFS文件系统延迟/冻结?(android - how to avoid lag/freezes with Samsung RFS filesystem?)
  • TensorFlow:基于索引列表创建新张量(TensorFlow: Create a new tensor based on list of indices)
  • 企业安全培训的各项内容
  • 错误:RPC失败;(error: RPC failed; curl transfer closed with outstanding read data remaining)
  • C#类名中允许哪些字符?(What characters are allowed in C# class name?)
  • NumPy:将int64值存储在np.array中并使用dtype float64并将其转换回整数是否安全?(NumPy: Is it safe to store an int64 value in an np.array with dtype float64 and later convert it back to integer?)
  • 注销后如何隐藏导航portlet?(How to hide navigation portlet after logout?)
  • 将多个行和可变行移动到列(moving multiple and variable rows to columns)
  • 提交表单时忽略基础href,而不使用Javascript(ignore base href when submitting form, without using Javascript)
  • 对setOnInfoWindowClickListener的意图(Intent on setOnInfoWindowClickListener)
  • Angular $资源不会改变方法(Angular $resource doesn't change method)
  • 在Angular 5中不是一个函数(is not a function in Angular 5)
  • 如何配置Composite C1以将.m和桌面作为同一站点提供服务(How to configure Composite C1 to serve .m and desktop as the same site)
  • 不适用:悬停在悬停时:在元素之前[复制](Don't apply :hover when hovering on :before element [duplicate])
  • 常见的python rpc和cli接口(Common python rpc and cli interface)
  • Mysql DB单个字段匹配多个其他字段(Mysql DB single field matching to multiple other fields)
  • 产品页面上的Magento Up出售对齐问题(Magento Up sell alignment issue on the products page)