Windows SVN服务器上SVN和SVN + SSH的区别？(Differences between SVN and SVN+SSH on a Windows SVN server?)

 我试图理解常规svn：//和svn + ssh：//访问之间Subversion存储库安全性的差异。 
 
 我已经在自定义端口和IP地址中设置了我的Subversion存储库，并在防火墙上打开了相同的端口，并将存储库配置为仅对经过身份验证的用户进行访问。 
 
 据我所知，subversion svn：// access通过subversion端口连接，而svn + ssh：//连接到ssh端口创建到服务器的隧道（就像使用PuTTY一样）。 
 
 我认为svn + ssh的使用是没有svn端口向世界开放的额外的附加安全性，还是我错过了其他的东西？ 
 
 编辑：如何svn + ssh：//命令不同于打开一个PuTTY隧道到我的服务器，并使用svn：// localhost /存储库，而不是？ 我读过几篇关于如何让svn + ssh在windows下工作的文章，但是我无法理解所有的东西。 用PuTTY打开隧道工作​​得很好，但我必须记得在调用svn：// localhost / repository之前先打开它。 

I'm trying to understand the differences in terms of subversion repository security between a regular svn:// and svn+ssh:// access.
 
I've setup my subversion repository in a custom port and ip address and opened that same port on the firewall, and configured the repository with access only to authenticated users.
 
From what I could understand, subversion svn:// access connects through the subversion port while svn+ssh:// connects to the ssh port to create a tunnel to the server (much like using PuTTY).
 
I assume that the use for svn+ssh is the extra added security of not having the svn port open to the world or am I missing something else?
 
EDIT: How is the svn+ssh:// command different than opening a PuTTY tunnel to my server and using svn://localhost/repository instead? I've read several articles on how to get subversion to get svn+ssh to work in windows but I can't make much sense of all. Opening a tunnel with PuTTY works just fine but I do have to remember to first open it before calling svn://localhost/repository.

原文：https://stackoverflow.com/questions/312370