我必须放弃Visio 2013中的遗留ERD图吗？(Must I abandon legacy ERD diagrams in Visio 2013?)

 为您的要求做 
 
if (InSet(value)(GetValue1(), GetValue2(), GetValue3()))
{
   // Do something here...
}
 
 尝试这个： 
 
template <typename T>
class InSetHelper
{
     const T &Value;
     void operator=(const InSetHelper &);
public:
     InSetHelper(const T &value) : Value(value) {}

     template<class Other, class Another>
     bool operator()(const Other &value1, const Another &value2) const
     {
         return Value == value1 || Value == value2;
     }
     template<class Other, class Another, class AThird>
     bool operator()(const Other &value1, const Another &value2, const AThird &value3) const
     {
         return Value == value1 || Value == value2 || Value == value3;
     }
};

template <typename T> 
InSetHelper<T> InSet(const T &value) { return InSetHelper<T>(value); }
 
 不过这个语法可能更清晰： 
 
if (MakeSet(GetValue1(), GetValue2(), GetValue3()).Contains(value))
{
   // Do something here...
}

template <typename T, typename U, typename V>
class Set3
{
    const T& V1;
    const U& V2;
    const V& V3;
    void operator=(const Set3 &);
public:
    Set3(const T &v1, const U &v2, const V &v3) : V1(v1), V2(v2), V3(v3) {}

    template <typename W>
    bool Contains(const W &mp;v) const
    {
        return V1 == v || V2 == v || V3 == v;
    }
};

template <typename T, typename U>
class Set2 
{ 
     // as above 
};

template <typename T, typename U, typename V>
Set3<T, U, V> MakeSet(const T &v1, const U &v2, const V &v3)
{
    return Set3<T, U, V>(v1, v2, v3);
}

template <typename T, typename U>
Set3<T, U> MakeSet(const T &v1, const U &v23)
{
    return Set3<T, U, V>(v1, v2);
}
 
 如果这些值真的是树或链表的一部分，那么你已经有了你的集合/容器，而你最好的选择就是使用一些递归： 
 
parent.ThisOrDescendantHasValue(value);
 
 您只需将它添加到属于父类和子类的任何类别中： 
 
class Node
{
public: 
    Value GetValue();
    Node *GetChild();
    bool ThisOrDescendantHasValue(const Value &value)
    {
        return GetValue() == value
           || (GetChild() && GetChild->ThisOrDescendantHasValue(value));
    }
};

For your request to do 
 
if (InSet(value)(GetValue1(), GetValue2(), GetValue3()))
{
   // Do something here...
}
 
Try this:
 
template <typename T>
class InSetHelper
{
     const T &Value;
     void operator=(const InSetHelper &);
public:
     InSetHelper(const T &value) : Value(value) {}

     template<class Other, class Another>
     bool operator()(const Other &value1, const Another &value2) const
     {
         return Value == value1 || Value == value2;
     }
     template<class Other, class Another, class AThird>
     bool operator()(const Other &value1, const Another &value2, const AThird &value3) const
     {
         return Value == value1 || Value == value2 || Value == value3;
     }
};

template <typename T> 
InSetHelper<T> InSet(const T &value) { return InSetHelper<T>(value); }
 
This syntax might be more clear though:
 
if (MakeSet(GetValue1(), GetValue2(), GetValue3()).Contains(value))
{
   // Do something here...
}

template <typename T, typename U, typename V>
class Set3
{
    const T& V1;
    const U& V2;
    const V& V3;
    void operator=(const Set3 &);
public:
    Set3(const T &v1, const U &v2, const V &v3) : V1(v1), V2(v2), V3(v3) {}

    template <typename W>
    bool Contains(const W &v) const
    {
        return V1 == v || V2 == v || V3 == v;
    }
};

template <typename T, typename U>
class Set2 
{ 
     // as above 
};

template <typename T, typename U, typename V>
Set3<T, U, V> MakeSet(const T &v1, const U &v2, const V &v3)
{
    return Set3<T, U, V>(v1, v2, v3);
}

template <typename T, typename U>
Set3<T, U> MakeSet(const T &v1, const U &v23)
{
    return Set3<T, U, V>(v1, v2);
}
 
If those values are really part of a tree or a linked list, then you have your set/container already, and your best bet is to just use some recursion:
 
parent.ThisOrDescendantHasValue(value);
 
You'd just add this to whatever class parent and child belong to:
 
class Node
{
public: 
    Value GetValue();
    Node *GetChild();
    bool ThisOrDescendantHasValue(const Value &value)
    {
        return GetValue() == value
           || (GetChild() && GetChild->ThisOrDescendantHasValue(value));
    }
};